Latest Updates: business RSS

  • The human rights dilemma

    2:55 pm on December 20, 2012 | 0 Permalink | Comment
    Tags: Burma, business, , Myanmar

     

    The responsibility of business to respect human rights has never been more relevant.  Yet many companies still lack an approach that is sufficiently transparent and rigorous to meet this obligation.

    In our strategy and communications work for companies, we find that human rights is an issue fraught with dilemmas and that managing it well is complex. Yet companies need to have their eyes wide open when addressing their human rights obligations—not only in their own operations, but also in their supply chains. Myanmar (Burma) is a case in point. With the government’s recent reformist moves many companies are rushing to renew business with Myanmar, but caution is still recommended  in these early days. The country still ranks no. 6 on the newly released Human Rights Risk Atlas 2013. When business decisions and activities that impact human rights are executed poorly, the price can be high, like appearing on this undesirable list. Fortunately, there are tools on hand to provide guidance. Chief among them is the new Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights endorsed by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Guiding Principles set a framework for business and human rights that delineates the government duty to protect human rights and the business responsibility to respect human rights. Many companies are now integrating the Guiding Principles into their human rights strategy.

    In working with our clients on the complex issue of human rights, we make some key recommendations, including:

    Do your homework: Conducting proper due diligence of operations worldwide is essential—including the supply chain and  new acquisitions, with a laser focus on high-risk countries.

    Inform and educate: Employees are on the front line of meeting a company’s human rights obligations. Too often, they lack the guidance they need to make the right decisions. Training and educating employees on human rights is paramount.

    Grasp the opportunities: The human rights terrain is dotted not just with risk but also opportunity for companies to use their core business to further human rights.

    Be open and honest: A defensive approach will always backfire. Transparency about how a company handles human rights and openness about difficult issues that arise go a long way towards inspiring trust.

    Engage in dialogue: The business obligation to respect human rights is best served when companies engage in dialogue to find solutions to complex challenges—within or across industries, with human rights experts, governmental bodies and NGOs.

    The business-human rights dilemma won’t get any easier or less complex. Companies that invest in a thorough, consistent and transparent strategy while acknowledging they don’t have all the answers offers the most credibility.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
  • Australia's new Carbon Tax

    9:01 am on July 23, 2012 | 0 Permalink | Comment
    Tags: Australia, business, carbon tax, clean energy, , market mechanism

    Q: What does One Stone have in common with a Melbourne cemetery, Arnold Schwartzegger and a bakery chain called Brumby’s?
    A: The answer is to do with carbon emissions. And we’re on Arnie’s side.

    On July 1st Australia’s Carbon Tax came into effect. That means the country’s 500 biggest polluters must now pay a price for their emissions—initially set at (AUD)$23 a tonne, and increasing gradually until 2015, when it will convert into a trading scheme based on market prices. Most affected are energy generators and mining companies like Macquarie Generation, Woodside Petroleum and Rio Tinto.

    Touted as a key part of the Gillard Labor government’s drive for a clean energy future, the carbon ‘tax’ has paralyzed political debate in Australia over the past year. It has spawned vehement new parties like the No Climate Tax Climate Sceptics Party (NCTCS),
    while Liberal National Party Opposition leader Tony Abbott has pledged “in blood” to dismantle it as soon as he wins the next election—amplifying uncertainty for business and investors.

    At least part of the blame for this hostility to the carbon tax lies with the Gillard minority government, which has done an appalling job at explaining both the rationale behind the tax and why it changed its mind.

    But huge credit goes to the Australian Greens for staying on-message and leveraging their support of Gillard’s government to put climate change on the national agenda. There’s no doubt that pricing carbon is a vital first step to building a clean energy economy for Australia.

    So three weeks in, what has been the effect of a price on carbon? A survey by the Australian Industry Group claims 42 per cent of manufacturing, services and construction businesses will increase their prices due to the carbon tax. Virgin Australia, which has already added a surcharge to its domestic and international air fares to cover Australian and European carbon pricing regimes, expects the overall cost to reach $45-50 million.

    But for most companies, it’s too early to say: it could take 6-9 months before they know their actual costs.

    That hasn’t stopped a handful of businesses taking advantage of the carbon tax—or blaming it for their woes—spawning a lively ‘Misleading Headline of the Day’ discussion on the Australian Sustainability Group’s LinkedIn page.

    Among the most brazen was Brumby’s bakery, whose now-former Managing Director Deane Priest sent out a memo urging franchisees to put up prices and “let the carbon tax take the blame.” Similarly, a staff member at Springvale Botanical Cemetery was had up for announcing the cost of burial had risen by $55 due to the carbon tax. Meanwhile headlines that the aged Munmorah Power Station was forced to close as a result of the carbon price—even though it hasn’t operated since 2010—read like an effect in search of a cause.

    Over 630 complaints and enquiries over cases like these have led the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to issue several warnings over illegitimate cost pass-through, where retail price rises are wrongly attributed to the tax. To prevent misrepresentations about the impact of carbon tax-related cost increases, the ACCC has launched a Carbon Price Claims Hotline. Companies found to be misleading consumers face legal action and hefty fines.

    With so much media attention on the carbon tax critics and conmen, Businesses for a Clean Economy (B4CE) stands out for speaking up in support of a price on carbon. One Stone is among 398 signatories—including Westpac, AGL and General Electric—who think it’s important the voice of proactive business is heard in the Australian debate.

    Which brings us to Arnie. Thinking big, as ever, Arnold Schwartzenegger is not waiting for national governments to overcome political gridlock and carbon paralysis. As Founding Chair of R20 Regions of Climate Action, a UN-backed NGO launched in 2011, Schwartzenegger is focusing on developing carbon leadership at local and state level. By linking government, finance and green technology partners, R20 is spearheading a bottom-up movement to counter carbon policy gridlock and take meaningful action at the sub-national level.

    That definitely gets our vote.

     
  • Festive Cheer and Sustainability in Sweden

    7:30 am on December 21, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Comment
    Tags: business, , government, NGOs, , ,

    2010 has seen bustling activity at One Stone in Scandinavia, the US, Australia, Southern Europe and the UK. During the year we have worked with some of Sweden’s best known companies, and were delighted to be invited to write Ethical Corporation’s latest addition to their Country Briefing series.

    So One Stone’s Christmas gift to you this year is a taste of essential Scandinavian reading. Why not tuck into your own copy of our Sweden Country Briefing by taking up Ethical Corporation magazine’s two week trial offer? Sample the key flavours of Sweden’s sustainability cornucopia and savour our insights into corporate, government and NGO activities. And for a little spice, enjoy our case studies of Ericsson, SCA and the Swedish fashion industry.

    Happy reading from all of us at One Stone, and the very best for a successful 2011!

    Photo courtesy of Hans Kylberg, Flickr Creative Commons

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel